MIARE: Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment : HomePage

HomePage :: Categories :: PageIndex :: RecentChanges :: Login/Register
Most recent edit on 2008-04-15 08:39:36 by JavierSantoyo

Additions:
- Contact

Deletions:
- Contact



Edited on 2007-02-27 09:30:37 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment (MIARE) is a set of reporting guidelines which describes the minimum information that should be reported about an RNAi experiment to enable the unambiguous interpretation and reproduction of the results. MIARE forms part of a larger effort to develop RNAi data standards that include a data model, data exchange format, Controlled Vocabulary and supporting software tools.

Deletions:
Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment (MIARE) is a set of reporting guidelines which describes the minimum information that should be reported about an RNAi experiment to enable the unambiguous interpretation and reproduction of the results. MIARE forms part of a larger effort to develop RNAi data standards that include a data model, data exchange format, Controlled Vocabulary and supporting software tools.



Edited on 2007-02-20 09:18:21 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-Guidelines

Deletions:
Guidelines



Edited on 2007-02-20 08:53:19 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
Guidelines

Deletions:
MIAREReportingGuidelines



Edited on 2007-02-20 08:51:26 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
MIAREReportingGuidelines

Deletions:
The proposed guidelines are based on a benchmarking screen as well as extensive consultation with experts in database development, bioinformatics, RNAi, and high-throughput screening technologies. The resulting MIARE document contains sections on experimental description and design, samples, delivery methods, assay plate design and layout, the RNA silencing reagent, assay design, and data analysis. Detailed reports containing these elements will allow end users to objectively evaluate the quality of the data sets and the final interpretations in the context of the assay. The sections are summarized below with more extensive descriptions available from the MIARE Project. In addition, opportunity for public dialogue is encouraged and available at MIARE Forums and MIARE mailing lists.



Edited on 2007-02-20 08:47:51 by GraemeGrimes

Deletions:
~1. Experimental Description and Design. This introductory section consists of two elements focusing on experimental description and design. The experimental description provides a broad overview of the experiment and includes key information such as the primary contact, a short description of the biological or technical hypothesis being addressed and the target organism in which the experiments are being performed. The experimental design section provides the context of the experiment including assays conducted, descriptions of the number and type of replicates, details of follow-up confirmation studies, and links to related information.
2. Samples. This section parallels the MIAME version 1.1 “Samples” section and describes both the source of the sample and any biological perturbations applied using art-recognized descriptors (e.g. cell line, passage number) derived from well established databases (e.g. ATCC) or literature citations. Treatments are divided into three classes and include those associated with (1) general growth and/or cell culture conditions, (2) pre-siRNA treatments, and (3) post-siRNA treatments. Both pre- and post-treatment categories require a description or reference to the treatment type, the compound used, and the protocol employed
3. Delivery. This section provides details of how the silencing reagent(s) were introduced into the biological sample. In addition to generic descriptors that cover standard methods of delivery (transfection, transduction, electroporation, specific details pertaining to the type and concentration of the delivery reagent, cell density at the time of delivery, the concentration of siRNA, and protocol are included.
4. Assay Plate. The “Assay Plate” section describes conditions of the plates in which the data is acquired. Critical descriptors include the number of cells per well, and the time between silencing reagent delivery and performance of the assay. In addition, details pertaining to media changes and any treatments are also essential.
5. Assay Plate Layout] This section describes the common features of the assay plates used in the experiment. Similar to the equivalent section of MIAME, this section is divided into two parts. The first part includes a description of the assay plate as a whole such as plate type, manufacturer and catalogue number. The second section describes the plate configuration including the well position of each reagent, the reagent type (e.g., experimental siRNA, or shRNA (short hairpin RNA), the target and any controls (positive and negative).
6. Silencing RNA Reagent This section describes the silencing reagents used in the experiment including a description of target genes (e.g., official gene symbol, sequence(s) database accession number), physical descriptions of the siRNA(s) (e.g., sequence(s) if available) and the manufacturer (unique catalog number) or source (if not commercial). In cases where libraries of silencing reagents are used, identification of manufacturer and version of the library are included. Furthermore, as an increasing number of synthetic siRNAs incorporate modifications and/or conjugates that enhance stability, delivery, and/or specificity, descriptions of these features should be included when available. For expressed shRNAs, descriptions and references regarding the vector, the characteristics of the shRNA design (e.g., stem and loop composition), and the method of delivery (e.g., transient expression vs. viral transduction) should be included. In cases where validation studies utilize a second unrelated set of silencing reagents, the unique features (sequence, modification pattern, etc) should be reported.
7. Assay. The Assay section describes critical elements of the assay and data acquisition. Because the effects of RNAi can be measured at the level of the transcriptome, proteome and phenome (phenotypes resulting from knockdown), using a variety of techniques (quantitative RT-PCR, Western blot, apoptosis assay, etc), detailed descriptions of protocols and reagents are imperative. Where guidelines exist for a specific assay or procedure, references should be included. Where guidelines are absent, a detailed set of descriptors including a summary of the assay, protocols, equipment, readout units and other points should be entered into the document. In cases where multiple assays are employed in a single screen, detailed descriptions of each should be included. This would include descriptions of selection-based assays, live/dead assays, modifier assays and validation assays used to verify the readouts (e.g., phenotypes) of hits selected in primary screens to ensure consistency with the original readout.
8. Data Analysis and Output. The Data Analysis section defines the transformation, normalization, and scoring procedures used to filter background effects. Further, this section is used to report data for the specific controls, the statistical procedures employed for hit identification (e.g., z-score), and the quality control steps that are applied to the data (e.g., Z’-factor). Reporting of the Data Output will occur in a separate section dedicated to the raw quantitative or qualitative data. For quantitative data, investigators may provide a brief description of how the data was quantized followed by the raw unprocessed data and reference to a physical map of the actual data (e.g., an assay plate layout). Additionally, reference to an assay plate layout for unprocessed and scored sets will be required to properly orient and evaluate collections. For qualitative data, researchers will be asked to provide a brief description of how the data was acquired and references to assay plate layouts for unprocessed and scored sets. Researchers will also be asked to cite protocols and specifications for data, and will accommodate references to software for data acquisition
One of the shortcomings of RNAi-based screening is the consequence of off-target activity which is the sequence dependent knockdown of unintended targets generated as a result of identity with the seed region of an siRNA (base positions 2-7 of the guide strand). Off-target effects can induce modest changes in dozens to hundreds of genes and has been shown to induce phenotypes in a variety of assays. For this reason, validation studies are an integral part of RNAi screening and should be included in any MIARE documentation. We propose that validation studies should be separate from but linked to the primary screen and report all the elements associated with MIARE. Thus adequate descriptions of any additional sequences, modifications), delivery methods, assays, and assay plate configurations associated with validation procedures should be included.




Edited on 2007-02-20 08:22:50 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment (MIARE) is a set of reporting guidelines which describes the minimum information that should be reported about an RNAi experiment to enable the unambiguous interpretation and reproduction of the results. MIARE forms part of a larger effort to develop RNAi data standards that include a data model, data exchange format, Controlled Vocabulary and supporting software tools.

Deletions:
Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment (MIARE) is a set of reporting guidelines which describes the minimum information that should be reported about an RNAi experiment to enable the unambiguous interpretation and reproduction of the results. MIARE forms part of a larger effort to develop RNAi data standards that include a data model, data exchange, Controlled Vocabulary format and supporting software tools.



Edited on 2007-02-19 08:09:13 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment (MIARE) is a set of reporting guidelines which describes the minimum information that should be reported about an RNAi experiment to enable the unambiguous interpretation and reproduction of the results. MIARE forms part of a larger effort to develop RNAi data standards that include a data model, data exchange, Controlled Vocabulary format and supporting software tools.

Deletions:
Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment (MIARE) is a set of reporting guidelines which describes the minimum information that should be reported about an RNAi experiment to enable the unambiguous interpretation and reproduction of the results. MIARE forms part of a larger effort to develop RNAi data standards that include a data model, data exchange format and supporting software tools.



Edited on 2007-02-19 06:15:35 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~1. Experimental Description and Design. This introductory section consists of two elements focusing on experimental description and design. The experimental description provides a broad overview of the experiment and includes key information such as the primary contact, a short description of the biological or technical hypothesis being addressed and the target organism in which the experiments are being performed. The experimental design section provides the context of the experiment including assays conducted, descriptions of the number and type of replicates, details of follow-up confirmation studies, and links to related information.
2. Samples. This section parallels the MIAME version 1.1 “Samples” section and describes both the source of the sample and any biological perturbations applied using art-recognized descriptors (e.g. cell line, passage number) derived from well established databases (e.g. ATCC) or literature citations. Treatments are divided into three classes and include those associated with (1) general growth and/or cell culture conditions, (2) pre-siRNA treatments, and (3) post-siRNA treatments. Both pre- and post-treatment categories require a description or reference to the treatment type, the compound used, and the protocol employed
3. Delivery. This section provides details of how the silencing reagent(s) were introduced into the biological sample. In addition to generic descriptors that cover standard methods of delivery (transfection, transduction, electroporation, specific details pertaining to the type and concentration of the delivery reagent, cell density at the time of delivery, the concentration of siRNA, and protocol are included.
4. Assay Plate. The “Assay Plate” section describes conditions of the plates in which the data is acquired. Critical descriptors include the number of cells per well, and the time between silencing reagent delivery and performance of the assay. In addition, details pertaining to media changes and any treatments are also essential.
5. Assay Plate Layout] This section describes the common features of the assay plates used in the experiment. Similar to the equivalent section of MIAME, this section is divided into two parts. The first part includes a description of the assay plate as a whole such as plate type, manufacturer and catalogue number. The second section describes the plate configuration including the well position of each reagent, the reagent type (e.g., experimental siRNA, or shRNA (short hairpin RNA), the target and any controls (positive and negative).
6. Silencing RNA Reagent This section describes the silencing reagents used in the experiment including a description of target genes (e.g., official gene symbol, sequence(s) database accession number), physical descriptions of the siRNA(s) (e.g., sequence(s) if available) and the manufacturer (unique catalog number) or source (if not commercial). In cases where libraries of silencing reagents are used, identification of manufacturer and version of the library are included. Furthermore, as an increasing number of synthetic siRNAs incorporate modifications and/or conjugates that enhance stability, delivery, and/or specificity, descriptions of these features should be included when available. For expressed shRNAs, descriptions and references regarding the vector, the characteristics of the shRNA design (e.g., stem and loop composition), and the method of delivery (e.g., transient expression vs. viral transduction) should be included. In cases where validation studies utilize a second unrelated set of silencing reagents, the unique features (sequence, modification pattern, etc) should be reported.
7. Assay. The Assay section describes critical elements of the assay and data acquisition. Because the effects of RNAi can be measured at the level of the transcriptome, proteome and phenome (phenotypes resulting from knockdown), using a variety of techniques (quantitative RT-PCR, Western blot, apoptosis assay, etc), detailed descriptions of protocols and reagents are imperative. Where guidelines exist for a specific assay or procedure, references should be included. Where guidelines are absent, a detailed set of descriptors including a summary of the assay, protocols, equipment, readout units and other points should be entered into the document. In cases where multiple assays are employed in a single screen, detailed descriptions of each should be included. This would include descriptions of selection-based assays, live/dead assays, modifier assays and validation assays used to verify the readouts (e.g., phenotypes) of hits selected in primary screens to ensure consistency with the original readout.
8. Data Analysis and Output. The Data Analysis section defines the transformation, normalization, and scoring procedures used to filter background effects. Further, this section is used to report data for the specific controls, the statistical procedures employed for hit identification (e.g., z-score), and the quality control steps that are applied to the data (e.g., Z’-factor). Reporting of the Data Output will occur in a separate section dedicated to the raw quantitative or qualitative data. For quantitative data, investigators may provide a brief description of how the data was quantized followed by the raw unprocessed data and reference to a physical map of the actual data (e.g., an assay plate layout). Additionally, reference to an assay plate layout for unprocessed and scored sets will be required to properly orient and evaluate collections. For qualitative data, researchers will be asked to provide a brief description of how the data was acquired and references to assay plate layouts for unprocessed and scored sets. Researchers will also be asked to cite protocols and specifications for data, and will accommodate references to software for data acquisition

Deletions:
~1. Description and Design. This introductory section consists of two elements focusing on experimental description and design. The experimental description provides a broad overview of the experiment and includes key information such as the primary contact, a short description of the biological or technical hypothesis being addressed and the target organism in which the experiments are being performed. The experimental design section provides the context of the experiment including assays conducted, descriptions of the number and type of replicates, details of follow-up confirmation studies, and links to related information.
2. Samples. This section parallels the MIAME version 1.1 “Samples” section and describes both the source of the sample and any biological perturbations applied using art-recognized descriptors (e.g. cell line, passage number) derived from well established databases (e.g. ATCC) or literature citations. Treatments are divided into three classes and include those associated with (1) general growth and/or cell culture conditions, (2) pre-siRNA treatments, and (3) post-siRNA treatments. Both pre- and post-treatment categories require a description or reference to the treatment type, the compound used, and the protocol employed
3. Delivery. This section provides details of how the silencing reagent(s) were introduced into the biological sample. In addition to generic descriptors that cover standard methods of delivery (transfection, transduction, electroporation, specific details pertaining to the type and concentration of the delivery reagent, cell density at the time of delivery, the concentration of siRNA, and protocol are included.
4. Plate. The “Assay Plate” section describes conditions of the plates in which the data is acquired. Critical descriptors include the number of cells per well, and the time between silencing reagent delivery and performance of the assay. In addition, details pertaining to media changes and any treatments are also essential.
5. Plate Layout. This section describes the common features of the assay plates used in the experiment. Similar to the equivalent section of MIAME, this section is divided into two parts. The first part includes a description of the assay plate as a whole such as plate type, manufacturer and catalogue number. The second section describes the plate configuration including the well position of each reagent, the reagent type (e.g., experimental siRNA, or shRNA (short hairpin RNA), the target and any controls (positive and negative).
6. Silencing Reagent. This section describes the silencing reagents used in the experiment including a description of target genes (e.g., official gene symbol, sequence(s) database accession number), physical descriptions of the siRNA(s) (e.g., sequence(s) if available) and the manufacturer (unique catalog number) or source (if not commercial). In cases where libraries of silencing reagents are used, identification of manufacturer and version of the library are included. Furthermore, as an increasing number of synthetic siRNAs incorporate modifications and/or conjugates that enhance stability, delivery, and/or specificity, descriptions of these features should be included when available. For expressed shRNAs, descriptions and references regarding the vector, the characteristics of the shRNA design (e.g., stem and loop composition), and the method of delivery (e.g., transient expression vs. viral transduction) should be included. In cases where validation studies utilize a second unrelated set of silencing reagents, the unique features (sequence, modification pattern, etc) should be reported.
7. Assay. The Assay section describes critical elements of the assay and data acquisition. Because the effects of RNAi can be measured at the level of the transcriptome, proteome and phenome (phenotypes resulting from knockdown), using a variety of techniques (quantitative RT-PCR, Western blot, apoptosis assay, etc), detailed descriptions of protocols and reagents are imperative. Where guidelines exist for a specific assay or procedure, references should be included. Where guidelines are absent, a detailed set of descriptors including a summary of the assay, protocols, equipment, readout units and other points should be entered into the document. In cases where multiple assays are employed in a single screen, detailed descriptions of each should be included. This would include descriptions of selection-based assays, live/dead assays, modifier assays and validation assays used to verify the readouts (e.g., phenotypes) of hits selected in primary screens to ensure consistency with the original readout.
8. Analysis and Output. The Data Analysis section defines the transformation, normalization, and scoring procedures used to filter background effects. Further, this section is used to report data for the specific controls, the statistical procedures employed for hit identification (e.g., z-score), and the quality control steps that are applied to the data (e.g., Z’-factor). Reporting of the Data Output will occur in a separate section dedicated to the raw quantitative or qualitative data. For quantitative data, investigators may provide a brief description of how the data was quantized followed by the raw unprocessed data and reference to a physical map of the actual data (e.g., an assay plate layout). Additionally, reference to an assay plate layout for unprocessed and scored sets will be required to properly orient and evaluate collections. For qualitative data, researchers will be asked to provide a brief description of how the data was acquired and references to assay plate layouts for unprocessed and scored sets. Researchers will also be asked to cite protocols and specifications for data, and will accommodate references to software for data acquisition




Edited on 2007-02-19 06:13:06 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
The MIARE reporting guidelines were initiated by members of the RNAi Global in order to facilitate data sharing within the initiative. The guidelines were developed in part by a inter laboratory benchmarking study to identify minimal reporting parameters for high-throughput siRNA screens, and in part by workshops and discussions within the RNAi Global.

Deletions:
The MIARE reporting guidelines were initiated by members of the RNAi Global in order to facilitate data sharing within the initiative. The guidelines were developed in part by a inter laboratory benchmarking study to identify minimal reporting parameters for high-throughput siRNA screens, and in part by workshops and discussions within the RNAi Global.



Edited on 2007-02-19 06:11:23 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
The MIARE reporting guidelines were initiated by members of the RNAi Global in order to facilitate data sharing within the initiative. The guidelines were developed in part by a inter laboratory benchmarking study to identify minimal reporting parameters for high-throughput siRNA screens, and in part by workshops and discussions within the RNAi Global.

Deletions:
The MIARE reporting guidelines were initiated by members of the RNAi Global in order to facilitate data sharing within the initiative. The guidelines were developed in part by a inter laboratory benchmarking study to identify minimal reporting parameters for high-throughput siRNA screens, and in part by workshops and discussions within the RNAi Global.



Edited on 2007-02-19 05:38:49 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIAREReportingGuidelines065

Deletions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIAREReportingGuidelines0-6-5



Edited on 2007-02-19 05:38:05 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIAREReportingGuidelines0-6-5

Deletions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIAREGuidelines



Edited on 2007-02-19 05:37:01 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIAREGuidelines

Deletions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIARE-0-6-5



Edited on 2007-02-19 05:36:22 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIARE-0-6-5

Deletions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIARE-0.6.5



Edited on 2007-02-19 05:35:46 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIARE-0.6.5

Deletions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines [MIARE-0.6.5]



Edited on 2007-02-19 05:34:20 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines [MIARE-0.6.5]

Deletions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIARE-0-6-5



Edited on 2007-02-19 05:33:45 by GraemeGrimes

Additions:
~-MIARE reporting guidelines MIARE-0-6-5



Edited on 2007-02-07 03:37:48 by JavierSantoyo

Additions:
MIARE

Deletions:
MIARE



Oldest known version of this page was edited on 2007-02-07 03:34:37 by JavierSantoyo []
Page view:
MIARE
 

Introduction


Minimum Information About an RNAi Experiment (MIARE) is a set of reporting guidelines which describes the minimum information that should be reported about an RNAi experiment to enable the unambiguous interpretation and reproduction of the results. MIARE forms part of a larger effort to develop RNAi data standards that include a data model, data exchange format and supporting software tools.


Background


The MIARE reporting guidelines were initiated by members of the RNAi Global in order to facilitate data sharing within the initiative. The guidelines were developed in part by a inter laboratory benchmarking study to identify minimal reporting parameters for high-throughput siRNA screens, and in part by workshops and discussions within the RNAi Global.


News




Minimal Information About An RNAi Experiment (MIARE) – Proposed Reporting Guidelines


The proposed guidelines are based on a benchmarking screen as well as extensive consultation with experts in database development, bioinformatics, RNAi, and high-throughput screening technologies. The resulting MIARE document contains sections on experimental description and design, samples, delivery methods, assay plate design and layout, the RNA silencing reagent, assay design, and data analysis. Detailed reports containing these elements will allow end users to objectively evaluate the quality of the data sets and the final interpretations in the context of the assay. The sections are summarized below with more extensive descriptions available from the MIARE Project. In addition, opportunity for public dialogue is encouraged and available at MIARE Forums and MIARE mailing lists.

1. Description and Design. This introductory section consists of two elements focusing on experimental description and design. The experimental description provides a broad overview of the experiment and includes key information such as the primary contact, a short description of the biological or technical hypothesis being addressed and the target organism in which the experiments are being performed. The experimental design section provides the context of the experiment including assays conducted, descriptions of the number and type of replicates, details of follow-up confirmation studies, and links to related information.

2. Samples. This section parallels the MIAME version 1.1 “Samples” section and describes both the source of the sample and any biological perturbations applied using art-recognized descriptors (e.g. cell line, passage number) derived from well established databases (e.g. ATCC) or literature citations. Treatments are divided into three classes and include those associated with (1) general growth and/or cell culture conditions, (2) pre-siRNA treatments, and (3) post-siRNA treatments. Both pre- and post-treatment categories require a description or reference to the treatment type, the compound used, and the protocol employed

3. Delivery. This section provides details of how the silencing reagent(s) were introduced into the biological sample. In addition to generic descriptors that cover standard methods of delivery (transfection, transduction, electroporation, specific details pertaining to the type and concentration of the delivery reagent, cell density at the time of delivery, the concentration of siRNA, and protocol are included.

4. Plate. The “Assay Plate” section describes conditions of the plates in which the data is acquired. Critical descriptors include the number of cells per well, and the time between silencing reagent delivery and performance of the assay. In addition, details pertaining to media changes and any treatments are also essential.

5. Plate Layout. This section describes the common features of the assay plates used in the experiment. Similar to the equivalent section of MIAME, this section is divided into two parts. The first part includes a description of the assay plate as a whole such as plate type, manufacturer and catalogue number. The second section describes the plate configuration including the well position of each reagent, the reagent type (e.g., experimental siRNA, or shRNA (short hairpin RNA), the target and any controls (positive and negative).

6. Silencing Reagent. This section describes the silencing reagents used in the experiment including a description of target genes (e.g., official gene symbol, sequence(s) database accession number), physical descriptions of the siRNA(s) (e.g., sequence(s) if available) and the manufacturer (unique catalog number) or source (if not commercial). In cases where libraries of silencing reagents are used, identification of manufacturer and version of the library are included. Furthermore, as an increasing number of synthetic siRNAs incorporate modifications and/or conjugates that enhance stability, delivery, and/or specificity, descriptions of these features should be included when available. For expressed shRNAs, descriptions and references regarding the vector, the characteristics of the shRNA design (e.g., stem and loop composition), and the method of delivery (e.g., transient expression vs. viral transduction) should be included. In cases where validation studies utilize a second unrelated set of silencing reagents, the unique features (sequence, modification pattern, etc) should be reported.

7. Assay. The Assay section describes critical elements of the assay and data acquisition. Because the effects of RNAi can be measured at the level of the transcriptome, proteome and phenome (phenotypes resulting from knockdown), using a variety of techniques (quantitative RT-PCR, Western blot, apoptosis assay, etc), detailed descriptions of protocols and reagents are imperative. Where guidelines exist for a specific assay or procedure, references should be included. Where guidelines are absent, a detailed set of descriptors including a summary of the assay, protocols, equipment, readout units and other points should be entered into the document. In cases where multiple assays are employed in a single screen, detailed descriptions of each should be included. This would include descriptions of selection-based assays, live/dead assays, modifier assays and validation assays used to verify the readouts (e.g., phenotypes) of hits selected in primary screens to ensure consistency with the original readout.

8. Analysis and Output. The Data Analysis section defines the transformation, normalization, and scoring procedures used to filter background effects. Further, this section is used to report data for the specific controls, the statistical procedures employed for hit identification (e.g., z-score), and the quality control steps that are applied to the data (e.g., Z’-factor). Reporting of the Data Output will occur in a separate section dedicated to the raw quantitative or qualitative data. For quantitative data, investigators may provide a brief description of how the data was quantized followed by the raw unprocessed data and reference to a physical map of the actual data (e.g., an assay plate layout). Additionally, reference to an assay plate layout for unprocessed and scored sets will be required to properly orient and evaluate collections. For qualitative data, researchers will be asked to provide a brief description of how the data was acquired and references to assay plate layouts for unprocessed and scored sets. Researchers will also be asked to cite protocols and specifications for data, and will accommodate references to software for data acquisition

One of the shortcomings of RNAi-based screening is the consequence of off-target activity which is the sequence dependent knockdown of unintended targets generated as a result of identity with the seed region of an siRNA (base positions 2-7 of the guide strand). Off-target effects can induce modest changes in dozens to hundreds of genes and has been shown to induce phenotypes in a variety of assays. For this reason, validation studies are an integral part of RNAi screening and should be included in any MIARE documentation. We propose that validation studies should be separate from but linked to the primary screen and report all the elements associated with MIARE. Thus adequate descriptions of any additional sequences, modifications), delivery methods, assays, and assay plate configurations associated with validation procedures should be included.

Documents




Mailing Lists




Forums




Links





[Return to the top of this page]


Useful pages: TextSearch
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional :: Valid CSS :: Powered by Wikka Wakka Wiki 1.1.6.2
Page was generated in 0.3499 seconds